Best Token Holder APIs in 2026
Holder counts, distribution, concentration and historical snapshots are harder to serve than they look. A comparison of the APIs that provide token holder data and how they differ.

The short answer
Token holder data is one of the most requested and least well-served datasets in crypto, because it is costly to produce. No chain stores a list of who holds a token; it has to be derived by replaying every transfer of every token and keeping running balances. That is why many providers offer counts but not distribution, or current holders but not past ones.
- Bitquery: distribution on its 10 core chains, in real time and for past dates.
- Moralis and Covalent: holder endpoints on their chains.
- Etherscan / BscScan: lists in the explorer UI; the API endpoint needs a paid plan.
- Dune: analysis in SQL, good for research.
- Birdeye: distribution on Solana.
What to look for in a token holder API
- Distribution, not just a count. "12,400 holders" says little. The top-10 concentration says most of what matters.
- Historical snapshots. "Who held this token before the price moved" is a very different query from "who holds it now", and far more useful for research and airdrop design.
- Contract and exchange filtering. Pools, bridges, staking contracts and exchange wallets appear as huge holders and distort every concentration metric unless labelled and excluded.
- Chain coverage. The logic differs between EVM balances and Solana token accounts; a provider must handle both properly.
- Freshness. For risk scoring on new tokens, a list that is hours old is useless.
The best token holder APIs
1. Bitquery: best for distribution and historical snapshots
Bitquery serves token holder data on its 10 core chains, in real time and for past dates. That means current distribution, holder counts, top-holder share and point-in-time snapshots (who held what on a given date), plus the transfers and DEX trades that moved between those states, so a concentration change can be traced to the trades that caused it.
Address labels help separate real holders from pools, bridges and exchange wallets, the step that makes concentration figures mean something.
Best for: risk scoring, airdrop design and eligibility, research, token analytics, investor reporting.
Limits: no RPC. Very large lists on major tokens are heavy queries; bulk delivery is the better path at that scale.
Token holder API · On-chain proof of holdings · Docs: Token Holder API
2. Moralis: best REST holder endpoints
Moralis exposes EVM holder endpoints with typed SDKs and quick integration.
Best for: standard lookups in an app.
Limits: fixed endpoints. Its past-snapshot holder endpoint and its Solana holder endpoints were removed on 31 July 2026.
3. Covalent (GoldRush): best for breadth
Covalent (GoldRush) provides a holder endpoint across 16 EVM chains behind one REST shape.
Best for: multi-chain lookups with little integration work.
Limits: snapshots at a past block or date only on six chains.
4. Etherscan / BscScan: best for a quick manual check
Explorer holder pages are the fastest way for a human to eyeball distribution.
Best for: manual verification and spot checks.
Limits: built for the UI. The list endpoint needs a Standard plan or above and returns current holders only, and BNB Chain is on paid tiers only through the Etherscan V2 API.
5. Dune: best for research in SQL
Dune's decoded tables support cohort analysis, concentration studies and holder-change dashboards; its EVM balance tables are a paid Enterprise add-on.
Best for: research and published analysis.
Limits: not a real-time API.
6. Birdeye: best Solana-first holder view
Birdeye surfaces holder distribution alongside its token market data and security signals.
Best for: Solana token pages and risk display.
Limits: holder data on Solana and Robinhood Chain only, with distribution on Solana only.
Comparison
| Provider | Distribution | Historical snapshots | Label filtering | Chains | Delivery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bitquery | Yes | Yes, point-in-time | Yes | 10 core chains | Query, stream, bulk Parquet |
| Moralis | Yes | No (removed 31 Jul 2026) | Limited | Broad EVM | REST |
| Covalent | Yes | Partial (6 chains) | None | 16 EVM chains | REST |
| Etherscan / BscScan | UI-first | No | Limited | Per chain | Paid API (Standard plan+) |
| Dune | Yes, via SQL | Yes, via SQL | Community labels | Many | SQL / dashboards |
| Birdeye | Solana only | Partial | Security signals | Solana, Robinhood | REST |
What holder data is actually used for
- Risk scoring. A token where the top wallet holds 60% of supply behaves differently from one with a flat curve. This is the core input to most rug-risk models.
- Airdrop design. Snapshot eligibility at a past block, then verify claims against it.
- Investor reporting. Concentration and holder growth over time.
- Research. Cohort survival: do early holders stay, or does distribution churn completely within a week?
- Compliance. Identifying concentrated ownership and related-wallet clusters.
Each of those needs history. APIs that serve only the current state answer only the first, and only in part.
FAQ
How do I get a list of token holders?
Through a provider that keeps derived balances by replaying transfers; no chain exposes the list natively. Bitquery serves holders and distribution on its 10 core chains, in real time and for past dates.
Can I get historical token holders at a specific block or date?
Yes. Bitquery answers point-in-time queries, which is what airdrop snapshots and "who held before the move" research require. Many providers only expose current holders.
Why do holder counts differ between providers?
Different treatment of zero balances, contract addresses, exchange wallets and, on Solana, token accounts versus owners. Two providers can both be defensible and still disagree substantially. Check the definition before comparing numbers.
How do I measure token concentration properly?
Exclude pools, bridges, staking and exchange contracts first (they are custody, not ownership), then measure the top-N share of circulating supply. Skipping the exclusion step makes almost every token look dangerously concentrated.
Does Bitquery provide real-time holder data?
Yes. On the 10 core chains, holder distribution and snapshots are served both in real time and for past dates, so a risk score can update as distribution changes rather than on a daily batch.
Related reading
Updated on 10 October 2026 by the Bitquery team: each other vendor was checked against its own pages, including the paid Etherscan holder endpoint. Holder data is now scoped to the 10 core chains that carry it. AI tools helped with the edit.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Subscribe and never miss any updates related to our APIs, new developments & latest news etc. Our newsletter is sent once a week on Monday.