The Black Bull, four months on: the wallet linked to Ansem gave away 74 million tokens and still holds 58%
$ANSEM pumped more than 3,000x from its pump.fun launch, then bled out. We traced every token the Ansem-linked wallet sent and every trade, from launch to October 15. The money trail starts with that wallet's airdrops.
BBy Bitquery Research · Blockchain IntelligenceOn-chain snapshot October 15, 202614 min read
Updated October 15, 2026. This version replaces the article of October 13. We rebuilt every number on a live snapshot of all holders, and corrected these errors: the share of traders in profit is 47%, not 40%; the launch wallet's exit raised $11,915, not $18,190; the price top came on July 6–7; Jupiter routed 41% of volume, not 70%; one wallet sold its 8 million tokens 2 hours 26 minutes after it got them, not 44 seconds; and the wallet we called "one huge liquidity pull" made 2,110 small moves. The earlier version also left out that the airdrops came from the namesake's own wallet.
A memecoin named after a famous trader started life with a giant gift. Two thirds of its coins went to a wallet linked to him. Four months later that wallet and a second one still hold most of them. Neither has sold any on a Solana exchange. But the first wallet has given away about 74 million tokens. The nine wallets that got the first batch sold most of it within days.
The token is $ANSEM, also called The Black Bull. It launched on June 16, 2026, on pump.fun, the Solana site where anyone can spin up a memecoin in one click. Ansem is a well-known trader on crypto Twitter, and he claimed the coin in public eleven days later. Our June article covered the first split. Since then came the airdrops, the run, the bleed and a crowd left holding the bag.
Four months, by the numbers
A $6,275 dev buy turned into a $428M market cap in three weeks, then lost 75% of it. The Ansem-linked wallets still hold 58% of the supply. The active wallet airdropped about 74 million tokens, and the first nine wallets it paid cashed out $2.6 million. Fewer than half of the measured traders are in profit, and every group that arrived after June has taken out less cash than it put in.
$1.80B
Traded on Solana DEXs, June 16 to October 15
559,973
Addresses that traded the token
58%
Supply in the two Ansem-linked wallets
74M
Tokens the active wallet gave away
$2.6M
Sold by the 9 wallets paid on June 28
47%
Measured trader wallets in profit
Key findingsEach line has its own share link
58%
Two wallets linked to Ansem hold 580.4 million of the 997.4 million tokens. Neither has sold any on a Solana exchange in four months.
74M
The active wallet gave away about 74 million tokens: 50 million to 9 wallets on June 28, 17.5 million to 695 wallets on June 29, the rest in smaller sends.
$2.6M
The 9 wallets paid on June 28, a day before the public drop, sold $1.2 million of tokens on day one and $2.6 million by mid-October.
47%
Of 554,160 trader wallets we could measure, 47% are in profit, with unsold tokens valued at the October 15 price of $0.107.
−$26.2M
Every group of wallets that first traded after June 30 has taken out less cash than it put in, $26.2 million less in total.
−62%
Selling just 1% of the Ansem-linked tokens into the larger trading pool would knock about 62% off the price there.
01 · The launch minuteThe dev buys the whole curve and gifts 65%
Pump.fun sells the first 79% of every new token from a built-in price ladder called a bonding curve. When the ladder sells out, the token graduates to an open trading pool on PumpSwap. $ANSEM sold out in its first second, because the dev wallet, yHCxHB…cx6PRe, created the token and bought the whole ladder in the same transaction.
Thirty-seven seconds later the dev wallet sent 650 million tokens to GV6UUm…xVdC52, the wallet linked to Ansem. Then it dumped the rest in seven trades over nine seconds. The dev walked away with a profit of a few thousand dollars, close to what early press reports said. The gift wallet had never traded on a Solana exchange before.
Launch minute: buy, gift, exitJune 16, 2026 · UTC
21:05:48
Create and buy
The dev wallet pays 84.74 SOL ($6,275) for 792.45M tokens, 79.2% of supply
21:05:48
Graduation
The curve is sold out, so 206.9M tokens and 85 SOL move into a PumpSwap pool
21:06:25
The gift
650,000,000 tokens to the wallet linked to Ansem
21:06:29–38
Exit
The last 142.45M sold in 7 trades for 161.0 SOL, $11,915: about $5,640 of profit
Inside one minute: a few thousand dollars of profit for the dev, an open pool for everyone else, and 65% of the supply in one wallet. The dev wallet has traded since April 20, across about 2,800 tokens.
Source: Bitquery Solana DEX trades and transfers, June 16, 2026.Bitquery Research
02 · The quiet startEleven days in the trenches
For eleven days $ANSEM was one more coin in the pump.fun trenches. It traded every day, but small. Volume stayed under a million dollars per day and the price stayed under $0.001. A few days still pulled in crowds of more than ten thousand traders.
The quiet start, June 16–26
Daily DEX volume$60,000 to $860,000
Daily trading wallets337 to 17,852
Days with over 10,000 walletsJune 19 (17,852), June 21 (10,970), June 23 (10,423)
Daily average price$0.0001 to $0.0007
Source: Bitquery Solana DEX trades.Bitquery Research
03 · The claim and the airdropsWhere the 650 million went
On June 27 Ansem claimed the token in public. The chart woke up within the hour. Daily volume jumped more than a thousandfold in two days, and the daily count of traders went from hundreds to tens of thousands.
The claim, June 27
Swaps in the hour before 14:00 UTC253
Swaps from 14:00 to 15:00 UTC35,781
Daily volume, June 26 → June 28$0.06M → $87.9M
Daily trading wallets, June 26 → June 28337 → 32,707
Source: Bitquery Solana DEX trades.Bitquery Research
The airdrops came straight from the gift wallet. The next morning, twelve hours after the claim, it sent nearly 50 million tokens to nine addresses. A day later it sent about 25,000 tokens each to 695 others, the public drop. Over the summer it paid several hundred more. At the end of July it moved most of what was left to a second wallet, 7oU9nR…T7MsDM, which has not moved a token since.
Where the 650 million wentEvery token out of the Ansem-linked wallet, June 16 to October 15
About 74 million tokens went out as airdrops; 491 million went to a second wallet. The nine wallets paid on June 28 got two thirds of all the airdropped tokens in one morning.
Source: Bitquery Solana transfers and live balances, October 15, 2026.Bitquery Research
Every send out of the Ansem-linked wallet
June 28, 02:07–02:28 UTC49.89M tokens to 7 wallets; 2 more got 50,000 each at 04:27
June 2917.47M tokens to 695 wallets, about 25,000 each
July 1 – August 204.17M tokens to 600 wallets
July 31 – August 1491.0M tokens to a second wallet, unmoved since
August 31 – October 152.28M tokens to 10 wallets, six of them 333,333 each on October 1
Total handed out (not counting the second wallet)about 73.9M tokens
Source: Bitquery Solana transfers.Bitquery Research
04 · The first ninePaid a day early, sold on day one
The nine wallets that got the first batch did not wait. On June 28 alone they sold $1.2 million of tokens into the pools, while the price was still climbing. One of them sold its whole 8 million in less than a minute, two and a half hours after the tokens landed. By mid-October the nine had cashed out $2.6 million, and only one of them still holds a real bag.
What the nine did with 50 million tokensRunning total of their DEX sales, June 28 to October 15
Most of the selling happened in the first ten days. The nine got their tokens a day before the public drop and sold into the run that followed.
Source: Bitquery Solana DEX trades.Bitquery Research
The nine wallets paid on June 28
Tokens received49.99M
DEX sales on June 28 alone$1.18M
DEX sales before July 8$1.39M
DEX sales by October 15$2.62M
DEX buys, all period$0.34M
Held on October 153.77M tokens, 3.75M of them in one wallet
Fastest sellergot 8.0M at 02:12 UTC; sold all in 4 trades, 04:38:14–04:38:58 UTC, for $207,257
Source: Bitquery Solana DEX trades and live balances.Bitquery Research
05 · The run and the bleedThree weeks up, three months down
The price kept running for another week. It hit its all-time high in the night of July 6, when the market cap passed $400 million. That first week of July alone added well over $100 million to the value of the Ansem-linked bag, without a single token moving.
Then came the bleed. The price lost 60% by early August. It doubled again at the end of August, when one buyer spent millions in five days, and gave it all back within ten days. By mid-October it was 75% below the top, and the daily crowd had shrunk to about 12% of its July peak.
Price and daily volume, launch to October 15Daily average price, log scale · daily volume bars · red lines mark the namesake wallet's moves
The airdrops sit right at the start of the run. The claim, the 50 million to nine wallets and the 695-wallet drop all fall on June 27–29, before the top on July 6–7.
Source: Bitquery Solana DEX trades and hourly prices.Bitquery Research
The price arc
All-time high, hourly average$0.428, July 6 at 23:00 UTC
Market cap at the topabout $428M
Gain on the namesake's tokens, July 1–7about $155M
Early Augustabout $0.17
August 30$0.35; one buyer spent $7.36M from August 26 to 30, average $0.31
September 9$0.175
October 15 snapshot$0.107, 75% below the top
Daily trading wallets48,496 on July 4; 3,700–9,300 per day from October 1 to 7
Source: Bitquery Solana DEX trades and hourly prices.Bitquery Research
06 · The ledgerWho made money
For every trader we added up what they paid and what they got back, then valued any unsold bag at the mid-October price. A trader who moved tokens to their own cold wallet counts as one owner. We set aside wallets whose trades we cannot see on-chain: the ones that sent tokens to MEXC or HyperUnit, or moved large amounts in ways we cannot follow. They did a fifth of all buying.
That leaves 554,160 trader accounts. Together they are up about $48 million: $22 million already cashed out and $26 million still sitting in bags. But fewer than half of them are green. Only 47% are in profit, and the top 100 hold 59% of the gain.
Winners and losersMeasured trader wallets, unsold tokens at $0.107
More wallets lost than won. The crowd is up overall because a small group at the top made a lot.
Source: Bitquery per-wallet profit and loss.Bitquery Research
Timing decided almost everything. Traders who were in before the claim, or who caught the first four days after it, took the cash. Every group that arrived later has taken out less than it put in, and is at best break-even even with its bags counted at today's price.
Profit and loss by the month each wallet first tradedMeasured wallets only, unsold tokens at $0.107
The cash went to the wallets that came first. Every group that first traded after June 30 has taken out less cash than it put in: $26.2 million less in total. Their unsold tokens are worth $19.2 million.
Source: Bitquery per-wallet rebuild, June 16 to October 15, 2026.Bitquery Research
Profit and loss, measured wallets
Wallets measured (owners, after merging storage wallets)554,160
In profit / at a loss259,063 / 294,841
Share in profit at $0.107 · $0.10 · $0.2047% · 47% · 49%
Net result+$47.9M = $22.2M cash taken out + $25.7M tokens still held
Set aside: exchange or untraceable transfers2,462 wallets that bought $185.6M
Set aside: liquidity providers, who fund the pools2,984 wallets
Set aside: namesake, dev and the nine June 28 walletscovered in sections 01 to 04
Source: Bitquery wallet ledger, June 16 to October 15, 2026.Bitquery Research
07 · The crowdTourists, bots and failed swaps
The crowd came and went fast. 23% of all traders made one swap and never came back. About 500 bot wallets made a thousand swaps or more each and drove 30% of the volume. On the busiest day, failed swaps outnumbered landed ones two to one, the usual sign of bots fighting over fresh pools. Half of all priced swaps were under $10.
How the crowd traded
Wallets with exactly one swap130,180 of 559,973 (23%)
Wallets with 1,000+ swaps514, with 30% of volume
June 28 failed vs landed transactions628,246 vs 319,067
Share of volume routed by Jupiter (to Oct 7)41%; all aggregators 70%
Priced swaps under $1049% of swaps, under 1% of value
Swaps of $1,000–$10,0004% of swaps, 48% of value
Swaps over $100,00052
Source: Bitquery Solana DEX trades and failed transactions.Bitquery Research
Liquidity providers, the accounts that fund the pools, sit outside the crowd numbers. Their fee income does not show up in trades. One of them looked like a big winner that never bought a token. In fact it took about 11% of the supply out of the main pool in thousands of small moves, and put nearly all of it back.
08 · The whalesOne August ape, and a few slow buyers
The biggest single buyer spent more than $7 million over five days at the end of August, at about 31 cents a token. It moved the bag to a cold wallet, so we count the two as one owner, now down almost $5 million. Four other wallets each bought several million dollars of tokens over months, in thousands of small swaps, the pattern of a buy bot. All four buying wallets are empty today. They moved the tokens elsewhere, so the chain cannot tell us whether the owners still hold them.
09 · The 58% questionOne holder is the market
Two wallets linked to Ansem hold 58% of the supply. We found no lock or vesting on either one. The link to Ansem rests on what the wallets did, since Bitquery's labels do not name them: the gift seconds after launch, the airdrops that began the morning after his public claim, and the move to a second wallet.
Who holds the supplyLive balances of all 364,872 token accounts, October 15, 2026, 06:19 UTC
Ansem-linked wallets580.4M tokens · 58.2%
17 largest other holders85.3M tokens · 8.6%
Exchange hot wallets (MEXC, HyperUnit)15.2M tokens · 1.5%
The two main pools hold 11,720 SOL, about $1.2 million. The second wallet's 491 million tokens are worth $52 million at $0.107, 44 times that. About 2.6 million of the original billion tokens have been burned.
Source: Solana token accounts and pool balances, October 15, 2026.Bitquery Research
That makes the liquidity the real risk. The two main pools hold about $1.2 million of SOL. If the Ansem-linked wallets sold even 1% of their tokens into the larger pool, the price there would drop by about 62%. A real exit would wipe out the bid.
What a sale would do to the priceLarger PumpSwap pool on October 15, simple pool math
Even small sales would crash the pool. Arbitrage bots would spread the hit across other pools, but the total bid on-chain is small next to a stack this size.
Source: Bitquery pool balances, October 15, 2026.Bitquery Research
10 · The copycats48,565 tokens with the same name
The name spawned 48,565 other tokens since mid-June. Together they did almost four times as many swaps as the original, and 98% of them stopped trading within a week. $ANSEM itself is a rare survivor. Of the tokens launched on pump.fun in the same two weeks, only 91 traded on a hundred different days, and $ANSEM is the only one with more than a million swaps.
How many launches survivedTokens launched on pump.fun from June 16 to 30, 2026
Fewer than one launch in 4,000 traded on 100 different days. See our year of Solana launchpads for the wider picture.
Source: Bitquery Solana token and trade data.Bitquery Research
11 · Close of ledgerWhat four months produced
A $6,275 dev buy produced a token that traded $1.8 billion. The wallet linked to Ansem never paid for its tokens and never sold them on a Solana exchange, yet it decided who got paid first. The first nine wallets it paid cashed out millions. Every group of traders that arrived after June has taken out less cash than it put in.
$ANSEM, also called The Black Bull, is a Solana memecoin launched on pump.fun on June 16, 2026, and named after the crypto trader Ansem. He claimed it in public on June 27, 2026.
How much $ANSEM does Ansem hold?
Two wallets linked to Ansem held 580.4 million tokens on October 15, 2026, about 58% of the 997.4 million supply.
Did Ansem sell his $ANSEM?
We found no sale of $ANSEM on any Solana exchange by either wallet up to October 15, 2026. The active wallet did give away about 74 million tokens to other wallets.
Who got the $ANSEM airdrops?
The first 50 million tokens went to nine wallets on June 28, a day before the public drop. On June 29, 695 wallets got about 25,000 tokens each, and about 600 more wallets got smaller amounts over the summer.
Did $ANSEM traders make money?
Of 554,160 trader wallets we could measure, 47% were in profit on October 15, 2026, with unsold tokens valued at $0.107. As groups, wallets that first traded after June 30 took out less cash than they put in.
Trace any token yourself
Ask questions like these in plain English. The Bitquery MCP server gives an AI assistant the same Solana transfers, trades and holder data shown above, across 40+ chains.
This article is provided for informational and educational purposes only and reflects analysis of publicly available on-chain data as of the dates indicated. It does not constitute legal, financial, compliance, or investment advice, and nothing in it is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any token or asset.
The findings describe trades, failed swaps and token transfers observed in Solana data for the ANSEM mint from June 16 to October 15, 2026, and token balances read from all of the mint's token accounts at 06:19 UTC on October 15. Per-wallet profit and loss counts the dollar value of trades, values unsold tokens at the October 15 price of $0.107, excludes fees, and treats a wallet and a storage wallet it clearly swept tokens into as one owner. Wallets that moved tokens to exchanges, or between wallets in ways the records cannot follow, are reported separately and left out of the crowd totals, as are the launch wallets, the namesake-linked wallets and the nine June 28 recipients. Liquidity providers' fee income is not visible in trade data. Counts and figures may be revised as more data becomes available.
References to Ansem or to any other named person, platform or token describe on-chain records and the inferences drawn from them. Wallets described here as linked to Ansem are identified through public attributions and behavioural matching; we cannot confirm from chain data alone that any specific person controls a given keypair. References to drops, gifts or distributions describe on-chain transfer patterns and do not assert intent, and nothing here asserts that any named party acted unlawfully or should be read as an accusation of wrongdoing.
Nothing herein should be relied upon as a definitive determination of fact. Readers should conduct their own independent verification before taking any action. The authors and publisher accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from reliance on this material. All trademarks and company names are the property of their respective owners.